CAST Application Intelligence Platform vs SonarQube: Which is better? The current version of the application does not support testing for API.We would like the consolidation of all the different modules. This would help, so then we would be able to see analytics and results on one screen, like a single pane of glass. SonarQube vs. Phabricator - Open Source, Software Development Platform See all alternatives to SonarQube. SonarQube vs. Code Climate Interest Over Time Get help choosing one of these. Careers We're Hiring! Advertise with Us. For those that are not familiar with, ( I hope this post will make you at least try it or see it in action at ) you can take a look at an I’ve written some time ago. In one sentence Sonar is an open source platform that allows you to track and improve the quality of your source code. ![]() One of the key aspects when talking about software quality is the which is how much of your source code is tested by Unit tests. Sonar integrates with the most popular open source code coverage tools (,, ) and the well-known commercial by Attlassian. By default it uses the JaCoCo (Java Code Coverage) engine and you’ll shortly find out why Before we move on, I’d like to give many kudos to. This article is inspired by one of his s and its intention is to present a more updated comparison of the supported code coverage tools by Sonar and point out some differences regarding their results and the way they work. Recently Sonar changed its default code coverage tool to JaCoCo and this post tries to explain the reasons behind that decision. Skyrim tesv exe download. Will I even be able to un-install (properly) without that main file?? Some of the information is borrowed by Evgeny’s post and the image is also taken from. So thanks a lot Evgeny! Now let’s go to the meat. For the comparison you’ll see, I’ve used the latest available Sonar version 3.3, Maven 2.2.1, Java 1.6 and all analysis launched in a Windows 7 machine (Intel Core i3-2120 CPU @ 3.30GHz) with 8GB RAM. The projects were carefully selected ( a small, medium-sized and a large one – not that large as Java code base but large enough to extract some results ). I ran five analysis for each open source code coverage tool ( I excluded the commercial Clover from my comparison version ) and another five by disabling the code coverage mechanism. So that’s a total of 60 analysis ). In the following tables you can find some information about the code coverage tools and some basic metrics about the selected projects. Pay attention to the date of the latest stable release. Emma hasn’t been updated since dinosaurs era and cobertura is almost three years inactive. One might think that this isn’t an issue if they are stable and don’t need any new release. Well, the truth is that both of them have bugs that frustrate end-users and there’s no one to fix them. On the other hand JaCoCo is continuously evolving and improving The results of the analysis are displayed next. Some important notices. Emma doesn’t support Branch coverage that’s why you’re not seeing any metrics. Furthermore there are differences in the results of Line and Branch coverage, which are more concrete for larger projects. For instance in Sonar Jira plugin all three tools produce the same results whereas in Sonar analysis and Commons Lang projects you can see that the numbers are not the same.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |